The assessment of efficiency of saponin as bio-surfactant in removal of nickel and vanadium from soil contaminated by petroleum, Case study: Ahwaz oil pumping unit


1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran

2 Ph.D student of environmental pollutions, Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch, Tehran.

3 MS.c of environmental pollutions, Islamic Azad University, Ahwaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran


This study aims to evaluate efficiency of saponin, a bio-surfactant, in removal of heavy metals like nickel and vanadium from the soils which are smeared by crude oil and it was conducted according to properties of soils locating within Shahid Chamran oil Pump Station in 2016. For this purpose, after conducting primary studies and in order to determine pilot conditions of test, soil properties were initially studied in this zone and then 5 sampling stations were selected. Parameters of nickel and vanadium were measured along with the TPHs and pH. The studied phases included three variables of temperatures within ranges of (15, 25, 35°C), pH range (6, 7, 8) and concentration of oil compounds within ranges of 10000 and 30000ppm. The findings from assessment on efficiency of removal of heavy metals showed that the conditions with variables of temperature (35°C) and pH (about 9) included the best efficiency of removal of nickel and vanadium. Under concentration 10000ppm, the efficiency for removal of nickel shows rate of 42.98% at constrained mode for removal of nickel and 32.46% to efficiency for removal vanadium. In concentration 30000ppm, rate of efficiency for removal of nickel was 44.34% and also yield of 35.24% for removal of vanadium. This indicates by rising of concentration in oil compounds, the rate of efficiency increased in efficiency of soil washing.


Aghel K, Pekdemir B, Gibbs (2007) Evaluation of biosurfactants for crude oill contaminated soil washing. Chemosphere. 55: 113-115.
Bordoloi N, Konwar B (2009) Bacterial biosurfactant in enhancing solubility and metabolism of petroleum hydrocarbons. Journal of Hazardous Materials 170: 495–505.
Elvers B, Hawkins S, Russey W (1994) Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistery(Volume A25).
Weinheim,Germany: Wiley-VCH. Gholampour Arbabestan H, Gitipour S, Kardegar M, Rezaei M (2014) Analysis of effect of temperature, pH, and distilled water on percent of removal of pollutants mercury and chromium from contaminated soil by soil-washing technique (Case study: Zone of Tehran oil refinery). The Seventh national conference and specialized environmental engineering exhibition. Environment College of University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Hashemi SI, Mousavi SF, Taheri SM, Gharehchahi A (2010) Assessment of quality of underground water in 9 cities at Isfahan province for drinking use by means of fuzzy inference system. Journal of studies on Iranian water supplies 6(3): 25-34.
Holmberg K (2002) Handbook of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Leo chyojin Y (2010) Attenuation of petroleum Hydrocarbons in smear zones: A case study. Journal of Environmental Eng,
Mann M (1999) Full-scale and pilot-scale soil washing. Journal of Hazardous Materials 66(1): 19-36.
Matheney cole G (1994) Assessment & remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Merkel N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2004) Phytoremediation in the tropics—the effect of crude oil on the growth of tropical plants. Bioremediation Journal 8(4): 177-184.
Mouton J, Mercier G, Blais J (2009) Amphoteric surfactants for PAH and lead polluted-soil treatment using flotation. Water Air and Soil Pollution 197(1): 81-93.
Mulligan C, (2005) Environment Application for Biosurfactants. Environmental Pollution 133: 183-198.
Mulligan C, Eftekhari F (2003) Remediation with Surfactant Foam of PCP Contaminated Soil. Engineering Geology 70(3): 269-276.
Mulligan C, Yong R, Gibbs B (2001) Surfactant Enhanced Remediation of Contaminated Soil: a review. Engineering Geology 60: 371-382.
Nedjhioui M, et al. (2005) Combined Effects of Polymer/Surfactant/Oil/Alkali on Physical Chemical Properties. Elsevier Science – Desalination, 185(1): 543-550.
Rahman K, et al. (2002) Bioremediation of Gasoline Contaminated Soil by a Bacterial Consortium Amended with poultry litter, Litter Coir Pith Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant. Bioresource Technology 81(1): 25-32.
Seyed Razavi SN, Khodadadi A, Ganjidoost H (2011) Removal of petroleum from soil by means of biosurfactant. Journal of ecology 37(60): 107-116.
Sharifi Hosseini S (2009) Biological refinement of smeared soils with petroleum by chemical fertilizers. Journal of water and soil (agricultural sciences and industries) 3(23): 144-145.
Urum K, Pekdemir Y, Çopur M (2003) Optimum Conditions for Washing of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil with Biosurfactants Solutions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, 81(3): 203-209.
Vadiati M, Nakhaei M, Amiri Omaraei V, Mirarabi A (2013) Assessment of water quality in Karun River using fuzzy inference technique. Journal of engineering of water supplies 6: 39-48.
Zhou X, Venosa A.D, Suidan M.T, Lee K (2001) Guidelines for the Bioremediation of Marine Shorelins and Freshwater Wetlands. Cincinnati: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
February 2018
Pages 12-23
  • Receive Date: 14 May 2017
  • Revise Date: 09 June 2017
  • Accept Date: 15 November 2017
  • First Publish Date: 01 February 2018